After the attempt to halt the re-brand some at CILIP have
suggested it’s time for the profession to have a vote of no confidence in
E-Vaizey at their next AGM in September. The exact text is:
"In
view of his failures to enforce the 1964 Public Libraries and Museums Act, this
Annual General Meeting of CILIP has no confidence in
Ed Vaizey, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Culture,
Communications and Creative Industries, and instructs Council to work with all
other interested parties to protect library, information and knowledge
services"
I hope that the profession can now unite and put a line in the
sand. Nearly four thousand staff lost since 07-08 with many more surely to go
in the next few years. A thousand libraries to close by 2016 and probably as many
handed over to the voluntary sector, this will be a sector on its knees and
CILIP can either stand up and fight or the library sector as we know it will
fall and disappear in the next decade.
Ed Vaizey while in opposition said the following when The Wirral
were planning to close eleven libraries in 2009:
"Andy Burnham's refusal to take
action in the Wirral effectively renders the 1964 Public Libraries Act
meaningless. While it is local authorities' responsibility to provide
libraries, the Act very clearly lays responsibility for ensuring a good service
at the culture secretary's door. It Andy Burnham is not prepared to intervene
when library provision is slashed in a local authority such as the Wirral, it
is clear that he is ignoring his responsibilities as secretary of state, which
in the process renders any sense of libraries being a statutory requirement for
local authorities meaningless."
Four years later and massive chunks of the library service hollowed
out, decimated and culled and the best he can come up with is:
“I don’t accept that the
public library service is in crisis”
Vaizey has redefined hypocrisy in his role as library minister and
he must be held to account, his inaction is utterly contemptible and shameful. The
library service which was protected by the 1964 act has been rendered completely
defenceless since the government closed the MLA, ACL and nobbled the power transferred
to ACE to ensure that nobody outside the DCMS in officialdom can utter a single
word in favour of intervention. The head in the sand approach to
superintendence is pre-planned and calculated to ensure nothing will be done,
regardless of how badly councils cut their library services.
I’m sure there are those at CILIP who will not want to rock the
boat, but the boat is already hulled below the waterline and at this stage it’s
about getting off the boat alive then seeing what can be repaired, there is no
value in playing nice and following the line of quiet diplomacy because that
approach has failed. I’m also aware that CILIP isn't just a public libraries
body, do you really think once the public library sector is decimated the
academic libraries won’t be destined for a similar fate? Make no mistake the
barbarians are coming for those libraries too, they just have to kill the
public libraries first.
I really hope this vote can be supported by all in CILIP, not just
because it is a vote about your very survival as a profession but because it’s
the right thing to do.
A quote from Carl Sagan, a man sadly gone but worth a
thousand Vaizeys:
“The library connects us with the insight
and knowledge, painfully extracted from Nature, of the greatest minds that ever
were, with the best teachers, drawn from the entire planet and from all our
history, to instruct us without tiring, and to inspire us to make our own
contribution to the collective knowledge of the human species. I think the
health of our civilization, the depth of our awareness about the underpinnings
of our culture and our concern for the future can all be tested by how well we
support our libraries”
If you're a member of CILIP please email: noconfidenceinvaizey@gmail.com and if you're
not a member, perhaps it’s worth joining if the organisation if its finally going to step
up and fight for libraries.
What would a CILIP no confidence in the Minister statement achieve exactly?
ReplyDeleteWouldn't it be similar to public sector unions saying they don't like public sector cuts i.e. stating the obvious but achieving very little.
In itself not a great deal, but the minister must not be allowed to go round telling the world the library service isn't in crisis when it clearly is. A professional body must give voice to its members views and concerns. Will it make a difference on its own? Probably not, but everyone remembers the slow hand clap Blair got from the WI, Teresa May getting booed by the police federation or George the towel folder getting booed at the paralympics. Politicians go round talking disingenuous, simplistic bollocks designed to placate the Daily Mail and Murdoch press and ignore the real issues we face because they are either too stupid to fix them, won't because it upsets their tiny core vote/funding pool or because it is at odds with their narrow, ideological and dogmatic worldview. I include all parties in that. I hope libraryuser1 we both value libraries, I presume so because of your name and the fact you found my blog, I urge you to email your councillor and MP and tell them to do all they can to protect the library service. Thanks very much for your comment
Delete